Specialised Products
Intimate Care
Intimate care is defined by where it is applied. The Cosmetics Regulation covers the external mucous membranes, so these products are cosmetics, but mucosal application demands attention to pH, osmolality, irritation and microbiology, and the line with medicines is sharp.
Intimate care, washes, wipes, and deodorising or moisturising products for the intimate area, is a category defined by where it is applied. The Cosmetics Regulationβs definition explicitly includes the external mucous membranes, so an intimate cosmetic is firmly within scope, but application to or near mucosa changes the exposure, the microbiology and, above all, the boundary with medicines.
Mucous-membrane application
Because Article 2 brings the external mucous membranes into the definition of a cosmetic, the assessment has to treat mucosal exposure rather than ordinary skin. Three things receive particular attention. The pH matters, because the external intimate area is naturally acidic and a product is normally formulated to respect that. Irritation potential is assessed closely, given the sensitivity of the site. And for products that could reach the vaginal mucosa, osmolality is relevant, because a strongly hyperosmolar formulation can damage the epithelium. These are not optional refinements; they are central to a competent assessment of the category.
Microbiology
Intimate products are held to a strict microbiological standard given the application site, and the preservative system has to be both compliant with Annex V and proven effective by challenge testing. A mild formulation that still achieves reliable preservation is harder to build, and the safety file has to show it has been achieved.
The medicines and device line
This is the decisive issue. A product that cleanses and deodorises is a cosmetic, but a product that claims to treat thrush, bacterial vaginosis or any infection, or to restore the vaginal flora as a therapeutic effect, is a medicine and not a cosmetic. Certain lubricant, barrier or fertility-related claims can instead make a product a medical device. The category sits close enough to these regimes that the claims have to be set with real precision to keep an intended cosmetic on the cosmetic side.
Claims
Comfort and appearance claims such as pH-balanced, soothing or freshening are acceptable when evidenced, but any claim implying treatment of a condition crosses into the medicines regime. The wording is assessed alongside the formulation rather than treated as marketing copy.
How we help
We assess intimate products for mucosal exposure, pH, osmolality and irritation, hold them to the appropriate microbiological standard with a proven preservative system, and set the claims carefully so a product intended as a cosmetic does not stray into the medicine or device regimes. Where a product genuinely belongs in those regimes, we identify it early.
Relevant services
CPSR
From Β£70 Β· 2 to 3 days
The Cosmetic Product Safety Report is the safety assessment required under Article 10 and Annex I of Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 before a cosmetic product may be placed on the UK or EU market. Prepared and signed by a qualified safety assessor.
Learn more βTesting
From Β£75
Stability, microbiology, photoprotection and analytical testing carried out in our three in-house laboratories. Analytical work is not contracted out; results pass directly to the assessor preparing your CPSR.
Learn more βClaims Testing
From Β£5,000 Β· 3 to 5 months
Clinical efficacy studies that generate the measured evidence a cosmetic claim needs, to a standard a regulator or a broadcaster will accept. For anti-ageing, brightening and other performance claims.
Learn more βFrequently asked questions
How are intimate care products regulated as cosmetics?
In the EU and UK, intimate washes and similar products are cosmetics, because the Cosmetics Regulation covers the external mucous membranes, but mucosal application demands attention to pH, osmolality, irritation and microbiology, and the line with medicines is sharp: treating an infection such as thrush is medicinal, not cosmetic.
When is a product a cosmetic and when is it a medicine in the EU and UK?
In the EU and UK, a cosmetic is defined by Article 2 of Regulation 1223/2009. A product becomes a medicinal product under Directive 2001/83/EC either by presentation (its claims) or by function (a pharmacological, immunological or metabolic action), and where it could be both, the medicines regime takes precedence.
What is a Preservative Efficacy Test (challenge test)?
A Preservative Efficacy Test, also called a challenge test, demonstrates that a product's preservative system controls microbial growth across its life. Oxford Biosciences performs it to ISO 11930 for Β£165: the product is inoculated with the five specified challenge organisms (Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida albicans and Aspergillus brasiliensis), and viable counts are enumerated over a 28-day window against the Criterion A or B log-reduction thresholds. Typical turnaround is six weeks, reflecting the protocol duration plus enumeration and reporting.
What is a CPSR?
A Cosmetic Product Safety Report (CPSR) is the safety assessment required by Article 10 and Annex I of Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 before a cosmetic product is placed on the UK or EU market. Annex I sets out two parts: Part A, the cosmetic product safety information (composition, physico-chemical and microbiological characteristics, stability, exposure and the toxicological profile of each substance), and Part B, the safety assessment, in which a qualified assessor states and reasons the conclusion on safety. It is the pivotal scientific document held within the Product Information File.
How are cosmetic claims regulated?
Cosmetic claims are regulated as statements of fact, not marketing copy. Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and Commission Regulation (EU) No 655/2013 establish six Common Criteria that every claim must meet: legal compliance, truthfulness, evidential support, honesty, fairness, and informed decision-making. Evidence must exist before a claim is published and remain on file. Oxford Biosciences reviews claims per claim (Β£125, minimum five) and prepares formal Claims Substantiation Dossiers suitable for the Product Information File and for production to a competent authority or the Advertising Standards Authority.